New approaches in education and health sciences management

New approaches in education and health sciences management

Civil Liability of Healthcare Providers in Novel Medical Technologies

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master's Expert, Private Law Department, Behshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Behshahr, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law Group, Behshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Behshahr, Iran.
3 Master's Expert, Private Law Department, Behshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Behshahr, Iran
Abstract
Background and Aim: The proliferation of novel medical technologies, such as artificial intelligence and robotic surgery, has created unprecedented legal challenges in establishing the foundations of civil liability. This research aimed to analyze these challenges and propose appropriate solutions for the Iranian legal system.

Methods: This study utilized a descriptive-analytical method, gathering data through a comprehensive review of legal texts, laws, and reputable articles. Data were examined using deductive reasoning and logical analysis.

Findings: The findings revealed that traditional concepts of fault and causation are inadequate in addressing the complexities of modern technologies. It was determined that the distribution of liability among healthcare providers, technology developers, and medical institutions requires redefinition. Furthermore, the existing legal vacuum has resulted in legal uncertainty for both patients and service providers.

Conclusion: The Iranian legal system requires the enactment of specific legislation incorporating a mixed liability regime (based on both fault and strict liability), the establishment of a compensation fund, and the formulation of transparent standards. These measures would support patient rights while providing the legal security necessary for fostering innovation in the healthcare sector.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Naziris N, Demetzos C. Advanced Health Technologies and Nanotechnologies in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1339:317. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78787-5_37
  2. Jordi N. Digitale Gesundheit, Telemedizin und Recht [Digital health, telemedicine and law]. Ther Umsch. 2022 ;81(6):223-230. German. doi: 10.23785/TU.2024.06.007
  3. Lei R, Qiu R. Impassable scientific, ethical and legal barriers to body-to-head transplantation. Bioethics. 2020;34(2):172-182. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12675
  4. Kuo SC, Lay HJ. [Legal Liability for Negligence: Nurse Aides Working in Hospitals]. Hu Li Za Zhi. 2021;68(4):14-22. Chinese. doi: 10.6224/JN.202108_68(4).03
  5. Miziara ID, Miziara CSMG. Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2022;77:100053. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100053
  6. O'Sullivan S, Nevejans N, Allen C, Blyth A, Leonard S, Pagallo U, et al. Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2019;15(1):e1968. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1968
  7. Tozzo P, Angiola F, Gabbin A, Politi C, Caenazzo L. The difficult role of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Liability: to err is not only human. Clin Ter. 2021 ;172(6):527-528. doi: 10.7417/CT.2021.2372
  8. Armitage RC. Digital health technologies: Compounding the existing ethical challenges of the 'right' not to know. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 ;30(5):774-779. doi: 10.1111/jep.13980
Volume 1, Issue 3
Oct 2024
Autumn 2024
Pages 23-33

  • Receive Date 21 June 2024
  • Revise Date 31 July 2024
  • Accept Date 21 September 2024
  • First Publish Date 29 October 2024
  • Publish Date 29 October 2024