New Approaches in Educational Management and Health Sciences

New Approaches in Educational Management and Health Sciences

Comparing the effectiveness of Bowen's systemic therapy and Minuchin's structural therapy on marital commitment and improving communication patterns of couples with conflict in Mashhad

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Hamid seraj kermani 1
Mehdi Ghasemi Motlagh 2
Barat Ali Ghavami 3
1 Department of Counseling, Boj.C., Islamic Azad University, Bojnord, Iran.
2 2. Department of Psychology, Boj.C., Islamic Azad University, Bojnord, Iran
3 Department of Counseling, Qu.C., Islamic Azad University, Quchan, Iran
10.22034/edus.2026.581288.1098
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: The use of effective family therapy approaches, including Bowen systemic therapy and Minuchin structural therapy, can play an important role in improving couples’ relationships and enhancing marital quality of life. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Bowen systemic therapy and Minuchin structural therapy on marital commitment and communication patterns of couples with conflict.

Method: This semi-experimental study with a pre-test–post-test design, with a control group and one-month follow-up, was conducted. The statistical population included all conflicted couples referring to counseling centers (Dr. Hokmabadi, Lifestyle, Farhikhtegan, Rah-e Sabz, Rasa) in Mashhad during summer (July to September 2024). Using convenience sampling, 18 couples were selected and randomly assigned to two experimental groups and one control group (12 participants per group). Data were collected using the Adams and Jones (1997) Marital Commitment Questionnaire and the Christensen and Sullaway (1984) Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Bowen systemic therapy (1978) intervention was conducted in 8 two-hour sessions, and Minuchin structural therapy intervention was conducted in 9 weekly two-hour sessions. To examine between-group differences, multivariate repeated-measures analysis of variance was used.

Findings: Results showed that Bowen systemic therapy and Minuchin structural therapy were effective on marital commitment and communication patterns in conflicted couples. Also, no significant difference was observed between the effectiveness of Bowen systemic therapy and Minuchin structural therapy on marital commitment, while a significant difference was found in communication patterns of conflicted couples regarding demand/withdraw and mutual avoidance patterns.

Conclusion: Overall, findings indicated that family therapy interventions based on systemic and structural approaches can, by improving family interactions, increasing couples’ awareness of dysfunctional communication patterns, strengthening responsibility and mutual commitment, and enhancing communication skills, play an important role in reducing marital problems and improving the quality of couples’ relationships.
Keywords
Bowen Systemic Therapy
Minuchin Structural Therapy
communication patterns

Ethics Approval ID: IR.IAU.BOJNOURD.REC.1404.029  

1.         Aman J, Abbas J, Lela U, Shi G. Religious affiliation, daily spirituals, and private religious factors promote marital commitment among married couples: Does religiosity help people amid the COVID-19 crisis? Front Psychol. 2021;12:657400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657400
2.         Arseneault L, Brassard A, Lefebvre AA, Lafontaine MF, Godbout N, Daspe ME, et al. Romantic attachment and intimate partner violence perpetrated by individuals seeking help: The roles of dysfunctional communication patterns and relationship satisfaction. J Fam Violence. 2024;39(8):1557-1568. doi: 10.1007/s10896-023-00600-z
3.         Calatrava M, Martins MV, Schweer-Collins M, Duch-Ceballos C, Rodríguez-González M. Differentiation of self: A scoping review of Bowen Family Systems Theory's core construct. Clin Psychol Rev. 2022;91:102101. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102101
4.         Hou Y, Jiang F, Wang X. Marital commitment, communication and marital satisfaction: An analysis based on actor-partner interdependence model. Int J Psychol. 2019;54(3):369-376. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12473
5.         Knapp KS, Bradizza CM, Zhao J, Linn BK, Wilding GE, LaBarre C, Stasiewicz PR. Emotion differentiation among individuals in a randomized clinical trial for alcohol use disorder: Within- and between-person associations with affect, craving, and alcohol use in daily life. Behav Res Ther. 2024;173:104474. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104474
6.         Matt LM, Seah TS, Coifman KG. Effects of a brief online emotion word learning task on negative emotion differentiation, emotional self-efficacy, and prospective distress: Preliminary findings. PLoS One. 2024;19(2):e0299540. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0299540
7.         Sohn MA, Zhao J, Tadros E. Integrating structural and experiential family therapy in neurodivergent families: A case study. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2024:1-11. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2024.2328260
8.         Sviri S, Geva D, van Heerden PV, Romain M, Rawhi H, Abutbul A, et al. Implementation of a structured communication tool improves family satisfaction and expectations in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2019;51:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.01.011
9.         White KL, Errington L, Ruggier S. Promoting parent agency across the world through the Parent Hope Project: The difference Bowen Family Systems Theory makes. J Marital Fam Ther. 2025;51(4). doi: 10.1111/jmft.70083
10. Lioe AL. The role of marital commitment and family support for marital satisfaction in childless couples. Eduvest. 2023;3(1):1-9. doi: 10.36418/eduvest.v3i1.712
11.       Krämer MD, Rohrer JM, Lucas RE, Richter D. Life events and life satisfaction: Estimating effects of multiple life events in combined models. Eur J Pers. 2025;39(1):3-23. doi: 10.1177/0890207024123101
12.       Shifaw ZG. Marital communication as moderators of the relationship between marital conflict resolution and marital satisfaction. Am J Fam Ther. 2024;52(3):249-260. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2022.2089404
13.       Fuchs R, Glaude M, Hansel T, Osofsky J, Osofsky H. Adolescent risk substance use behavior, posttraumatic stress, depression, and resilience: Innovative considerations for disaster recovery. Subst Abus. 2021;42(3):358-365. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2020.1784357
14.       Stieglitz J, Gurven M, Kaplan H, Winking J. Infidelity, jealousy, and wife abuse among Tsimane forager-farmers: Testing evolutionary hypotheses of marital conflict. Evol Hum Behav. 2012;33(5):438-448. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.12.006
15.       Clyde TL, Hawkins AJ, Willoughby BJ. Revising premarital relationship interventions for the next generation. J Marital Fam Ther. 2020;46(1):149-164. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12378.
16.       Shita NG, Zeleke LB. Predictors of divorce and duration of marriage among first marriage women in Dejne administrative town. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):8728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59360-5.
17.       Maya J, Fuentes I, Arcos-Romero AI, Jiménez L. Parental attachment and psychosocial adjustment in adolescents exposed to marital conflict. Children (Basel). 2024;11(3):291. doi: 10.3390/children11030291.
18.       St-Pierre Bouchard J, Brassard A, Lefebvre AA, Dugal C, Lafontaine MF, Savard C, et al. Cumulative childhood trauma, communication patterns, and intimate partner violence perpetrated by men seeking help. J Interpers Violence. 2023;38(9-10):6843-6864. doi: 10.1177/08862605221138651.
19.       J Chan P. Bowen theory, culture and therapeutic applications to Asian families. Aust N Z J Fam Ther. 2024;45(2):244-256. doi: 10.1002/anzf.1590.
New Approaches in Educational Management and Health Sciences
Volume 3, Issue 2
July 2026
Summer 2026
Pages 80-96

  • Receive Date 04 March 2026
  • Revise Date 09 April 2026
  • Accept Date 18 June 2026