New approaches in education and health sciences management

New approaches in education and health sciences management

Psychological Categorization of Attitudes Toward Singleness: A Qualitative Study.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Educational Psychology, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Psychology, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Psychometrics, Director of the Hooshbehr Psychometric Research Center, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: In Iranian society, where marriage has traditionally been regarded as one of the fundamental social values, the significant increase in the number of unmarried young adults reflects ongoing cultural transformations and changing attitudes toward marriage, which have contributed to a growing tendency toward singlehood. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify and classify the psychological typologies of attitudes toward singlehood.
Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using a content analysis approach. Data were collected from three primary sources: interviews with single young adults, interviews with marriage and family experts, and a review of domestic and international literature. A purposive sample of 131 single university students (79 males and 52 females) studying in Tehran in 2025 was selected. Among them, 20 participants took part in semi-structured interviews, while 111 completed an open-ended questionnaire on attitudes toward singlehood. In addition, 14 experts were interviewed to enrich the data. Following a screening process of 200 relevant sources, 12 Persian and 9 international references were selected and analyzed using the thematic analysis approach proposed by Braun and Clarke (2006).
Results: Seven major attitudes toward singlehood were identified: negative attitude, positive attitude, ambivalent-confused attitude, idealistic attitude, passive attitude, realistic attitude, and anxious-avoidant attitude.
Conclusion: Overall, the findings suggest that remaining single among young adults is not always a voluntary and satisfying choice. Rather, it is often associated with various constraints, anxieties, pessimistic beliefs, and insufficient personal, economic, and social readiness for marriage. Therefore, macro-level policymaking and targeted planning aimed at creating favorable conditions for marriage and reducing existing barriers may facilitate and accelerate the transition to marriage and contribute to the development of stable and satisfying marital relationships.
Keywords

1.             Dehghan Hesar M, Hajhosseini M, Gholamali Lavasani M, Hejazi Moughari E. (2023). Solo-living among single women: A Phenomenological Study of Challenges and Strategies. Rooyesh. 11(12), : 2. doi: 20.1001.1.2383353.1401.11.12.2.1
2.             Talebpour, A., Beiranvand, M. Qualitative Study of the Consequences of Definite Celibacy in Girls. Journal of Woman and Family Studies, 2022; 10(1): 10-35. doi: 10.22051/jwfs.2022.38040.2783
3.             Fallah F, kazemi A, Torkaman F. (2020). Reasons and preconditions for living alone among Tehrani women: A Home of Her own. Social Problems of Iran. 11(2), 267-289. doi: 20.1001.1.24766933.1399.11.2.12.3
4. Ghasemi Neyasar, R., Sadeghi, R., Torabi, F. Factors Affecting Attitudes towards Cohabitation among Iranian Youth. Journal of Applied Sociology, 2025; 36(3): 1-28. doi: 10.22108/jas.2025.142259.2537
5. Kalate Sadati A, Sadeghieh S, Jafari Naeimi F, Sadeghian Moghadam Z. The Intersection of Culture and Celibacy: Exploring Individual and Socio-Cultural Aspects of Prolonged Single Life among Unmarried Women in Yazd, Iran. JPAI. 2024;18(36):51-91. doi: 10.22034/jpai.2024.2023561.1333
6.             KavehFirouz, Z., Safari Shali, R., Khadem hoseini, Z. Studying Students’ Perceptions of Single Life; A Comparison of Genders. Social Studies and Research in Iran, 2025; 14(2): 283-304. doi: 10.22059/jisr.2025.388792.1578
7.             Gonzalez Avilés T, Bühler JL, Brandt ND, Neyer FJ. Today's Adolescents Are More Satisfied With Being Single: Findings From a German Cohort-Sequential Study Among 14- to 40-Year-Olds. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025;51(12):2461-2475. doi: 10.1177/01461672241257139
8.             Himawan KK, Himawan EM, Pratiwi PC, Sutanto SH, Dewi KS, Claudia C, Assa NA, Nasyiah FN. Development and initial validation of Tes SELARAS: a culturally-grounded premarital assessment tool in Indonesia. BMC Psychol. 2026; 11(3): 23-34. doi: 10.1186/s40359-026-04727-8
9. Sutic L, Orlovic KK, Sostaric M, Jelic M. Understanding the cognitive and emotional processes of singles from the perspective of attachment theory. In: The Retreat from Marriage and Parenthood: Examining the Causes and Consequences of Declining Rates. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2025. p. 33-52. doi: 10.1108/S1530-353520250000030002
10. Maharaj P, Shangase T. Reasons for delaying marriage: attitudes of young, educated women in South Africa. J Comp Fam Stud. 2020;51(1):3-17. doi: 10.3138/jcfs.51.1.002
11. Owolabi TJ, Garutsa T, Odhav K. Family background and single parenting among unmarried mothers in Nigeria. SSRN [Preprint]. 2023. doi: 10.38159/ehass.2024551
12. Pepping CA, MacDonald G, Davis PJ. Toward a psychology of singlehood: an attachment-theory perspective on long-term singlehood. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018;27(5):324-331. doi: 10.1177/0963721417752106
13. Park C, Harris VW. The impact of attachment styles on attitudes toward marriage: the mediating role of emotional intimacy. Fam J. 2023;31(2):269-277. doi: 10.1177/10664807221124271
14. Rosenfeld MJ. Singleness and the pandemic dating recession. J Fam Issues. 2025;46(6):1001-1027. doi: 10.1177/0192513X251322128
15. Shahrak SP, Brand S, Taghizadeh Z. Living with singleness: needs and concerns of never-married women over 35. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):129-139. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00635-1
16.          Tan CS, Cheng SM, George S. Development and validation of the Attitudes toward Singlehood Scale among undergraduate students in Malaysia and India. Collabra Psychol. 2021;7(1):24808. doi: 10.1525/collabra.24808
17. Kislev E. Singlehood as an identity. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2024;35(2):258-292. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2023.2241937
18. Apostolou M, Papadopoulou I, Georgiadou P. Are people single by choice? Involuntary singlehood in an evolutionary perspective. Evol Psychol Sci. 2019;5(1):98-103. doi: 10.1007/s40806-018-0169-1
Volume 3, Issue 2
July 2026
Summer 2026
Pages 11-28

  • Receive Date 13 March 2026
  • Revise Date 17 April 2026
  • Accept Date 13 May 2026